It was a surreal night for devotees of incumbent presidential and vice presidential national convention speeches.
The elocutionary excellence of speeches by Vice President Joe Biden and President Obama could not have been surpassed, yet the message would have left any disinterested viewer wondering, “Is that all you got?”
And preceding these speeches was another excellent elocutionist, Sen. John Kerry, whose incongruous taunt was to repeat his own statement from the 2004 campaign that toppled his presidential aspirations –referring to his flip-flopping --and use it as a charge against Mitt Romney: “Talk about being for it before you were against it! Mr. Romney—here's a little advice: Before you debate Barack Obama on foreign policy, you better finish the debate with yourself!”
This is not clever rhetoric, as Bill Clinton’s was when he quotes Ronald Reagan‘s taunt, “There you go again,”because that clever phrase was not used to destroy his own presidential race. It’s either a telling shot – in which case Kerry was admitting his campaign was flawed – or not a telling shot, in which case he implies it is not a significant criticism of Gov. Romney.
On to les speeches des jours (sorry):
Joe Biden. Yet another excellent practitioner in the art of public speaking – where do the Democrats get all of these excellent rhetoricians? Maybe it’s a Fluke…oops; not all of them speak so well.
Joe praised the President’s “grit” and “determination.” He learned on-the-job about Obama’s heart. He learned of Obama’s ability to take out bad guys like bin Laden – (is there no other foreign policy aggressiveness that the Administration can even claim?). He points out that General Motors was saved –there is some disconsonant evidence on this, but let’s grant that this selected winner has won.
In an unintended homage to the rhetoric of President Richard Nixon, the Vice President said, “And you deserve a President who will never quit on you.”
Joe has lost none of his remarkable pauses and crescendos and diminuendos. But this night, unlike the remarkable night of Bill Clinton, who not address why Obamanomics is more effective than you think and will lead us out of the economic morass in which we find America?
President Barack Obama. I cannot remember a weaker speech given in a more rousing style. This is the classic example of style over substance. The president should have taken a lesson from the exquisite, if substantively arguable, evidence-filled deliberative address of his new friend, President Clinton. (What irony – Clinton’s speech was touted as proof of a rapprochement between the two, when in reality it may have completely undermined Obama’s effort by comparison.)
I urge you to look at Obama’s convention address and then read it; judge for yourself if the excitement of his speech has anything to do with the meat of the content.
The speech was close to what we in Persuasion Theory call an “apologia”speech, one which implies regret for his not having accomplished what he said he would. He begged the audience to understand that it takes “more than a few years”to solve the problems that he implied (and will forever imply) were caused by President George W. Bush’s tenure in office. In one of his last lines he actually said prominently, “…we learn from our mistakes….” The president cites Franklin Delano Roosevelt, whose depression was double-dip and lasted until World War II.
His speech was Boxer speaking in Animal Farm: “I will work harder.”
He argued the lack of particulars in Mitt Romney’s foreign policy, but gave one non-committal sentence apiece on the critical challenges of Iran and Israel: “Our commitment to Israel’s security must not waver, and neither must our pursuit of peace. The Iranian government must face a world that stays united against its nuclear ambitions.”
President Obama’s speech came down to this: we are all in this together (the central convention collectivist theme), but our opponents want improvement only for themselves. We are bipartisan and cooperative; they are partisan and uncooperative. In fact they are recalcitrant. We killed bin Laden.
In the end there is nothing in the speech that would lead any listener to infer that the next four years will be better than the last four years.
“Hope and change” is down to “hope.” In four years that buzz word may be gone as well.
---
Red Maryland
The Premier blog of conservative and Republican politics and ideas in the Free State, named one of Maryland's best political blogs by the Washington Post.
Professor Vatz teaches Political Rhetoric at Towson University and is author of The Only Authentic Book of Persuasion (Kendall Hunt, 2012, 2013).
Dennis King
12:25 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012
It is helpful to note that Prof. Vatz' opinions are not those of an objective observer, but rather those of a member of the extreme right-wing of the GOP. This can be seen in his continued use of the term "collectivism" to describe the Democratic party agenda. There are two types of collectivism- horizontal and vertical. One can argue that the economic agenda of the Democrats-we are all in this together- is, in fact, an example of horizontal collectivism. However, vertical collectivism, the imposition of policy from the top down, is more accurately exemplified by the Republican's anti-abortion, anti-gay and anti-immigrant social agenda. There is no room for Individualism there. Moreover, GOP economic policy more closely resembles Objectivism (the immoral philosophy of Ayn Rand) rather than Individualism. Maybe, as the Professor states, there was nothing in the President's speech that would lead us to believe that things will get better, but in direct contrast to Gov. Romney, we know that the country won't be returning to the policies that created the financial collapse.
JDStuts
12:30 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012
Once again Vatz the Conservative Republicans of Maryland cordially invite you to wean yourself of the collectivist taxpayer supported state university teat and peddle your trade in the private sector.
Show us that individualist spirit that breaks the cycle of government dependency to become a man who stands on his own. Lead while others only talk.
David Taylor
12:45 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012
... and exactly where is a decent, hardworking "Professor of Rhetoric" going to find a job in this tough economy?
http://jobsearch.monster.com/search/Professor-of-Rhetoric_5?
number9dream
12:57 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012
I always switched stations when this pedantic stooge was a guest on the Ron Smith Show.
Nayana Davis
3:35 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012
A comment left by user David Taylor was removed for violating Patch's Terms of Use regarding misleading information. See the terms in full here: http://towson.patch.com/terms
David Taylor
4:14 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012
To be fair, I don't believe that there was anything incorrect or misleading in my comment... not in the least. I'll be happy to repost the rest of that commentary with the mention of Dr. Vatz's sponsoring certain student groups removed - if you and he prefer it that way.
Dr. Vatz did sponsor the YWC, which most members of the community realize now was/is a white power group... I certainly never suggested that he was a white power supporter, and yes, he resigned from the group after the protests and community uproar took pace. He made a mistake, and he's made his position clear on this site several times now. I'm sorry if referring to those past events caused you any trouble, and I appreciate that The Patch welcomes comments from everyone, even Dr. Vatz's material, or at least it welcomes most comments.
http://towson.patch.com/blog_posts/vatz-resignation-letter-to-towsons-conservative-youth-for-western-civilization
Steve
4:27 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012
I almost forgot about that. The YWC joining forces with the League of the South which is a SPLC listed White Supremacist/Hate Group.
http://vimeo.com/27791048
Richard E. Vatz
7:25 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012
Just thought some readers might find it interesting to know: for about 25 years I have been a contributor to The Southern Poverty Law Center. This is not relevant to this blog entry, but as the discussion has gone to other sundry topics, I thought it might be an interesting "full disclosure."
Back to the O's.
Vatz
David Taylor
8:13 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012
In my earlier comment which was censored, and which I'm sure you read, I referenced the YWC incident at Towson University - I thought you might find it interesting to know that I really don't think that you are the sort of guy who would knowingly support a hate group, I just mention it because it speaks to judgement - accidentally sponsoring a hate group - you must have been personally appalled by that I'm sure. It was an honest mistake and I find your own "apologia" believable and credible on the face of it. I don't think for a moment that a man of ideas like yourself would knowingly accommodate such a group.
Go Ravens!
Sean Tully
11:36 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012
Whether or not President Obama wins reelection, he is going down in history as one of our great modern presidents. The thing about Obama is that he has not needed a learning curve after taking office. He hit the ground running. He has accomplished alot and our country would be foolish to throw him out, but, unfortunately, our country seems to be getting more foolish as time goes by, so it is anyone's guess how November will turn out.
Richard E. Vatz
7:53 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012
We're okay, Mr. Taylor...I genuinely enjoy sincere, substantive exchanges with those who disagree with me.
Enjoy your week-end, bud.
Vatz
Vatz
Sean Tully
10:34 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012
I'm watching Mitt on Meet the Press this morning. Surprise! He's not going to abolish Obamacare and he is not "severely conservative". The man is a puff of smoke and it is all coming out now. Feeling duped, GOPers? You should. You got hosed.
Steve
5:10 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012
Normally you get an idea if someone is being less than truthful by looking at their facial expressions and their eyes but Mitt is so heavily Botoxed he has to force himself to even smile.