It’s time to man up – I was wrong about Jesse L. Jackson, Sr.
First, some background. I wrote a column in 2008 under the title, “Winners and Losers from Election ’08” in which I listed Jesse Jackson, Sr. as one of the biggest losers of that year.
Here is what I said: “His past contributions to America are undeniable, but his future place is uncertain. Every time he opened his mouth in the past year, he said something negative about Obama. First, Jackson criticized Obama for ‘acting white’ because he was not as forceful as Jesse wanted regarding the Jena 6 case in Louisiana. Then there was the infamous Fox News open mic incident where Jackson is heard saying, ‘See, Barack has been talking down to Black people…telling niggers how to behave…I wanna cut his nuts out.’ Finally, in October Jackson was speaking at the first World Policy Forum in Evian, France. Published reports have him saying if Obama is elected as president, ‘fundamental changes in U.S. foreign policy’ will occur. He said the most important change would occur in the Middle East, where ‘decades of putting Israel’s interests first’ would end. Jackson’s reputation has been forever tarnished.”
Jackson accused Obama of “acting white” in response to Obama’s tepid response to the Jena Six, the case of six Black high school students in Jena, La. arrested and charged with attempted second-degree murder for the beating of a White student. The charges were later reduced to aggravated second-degree battery and conspiracy. Many believed the prosecutor filed the more serious charges because the accused juveniles were Black. As we all know, Obama has no history of taking strong positions on anything when it involves Blacks.
As much as I hate to admit it, Jackson got it right when he accused Obama of “talking down to Black people.” Everyone, including myself, eviscerated him for making the comment and accused him of being jealous of Obama. How can we forget when Obama spoke at the Congressional Black Caucus dinner a couple years ago and told Blacks to “stop complaining?” Obviously, Jackson saw something in Obama early that the rest of us missed. Now, we are paying the price for it, especially Blacks.
Jackson was also right on point with his prediction about the changing U.S. relations with the Middle East. Our relationship with Israel has never been more volatile than it is now.
The Blacks in America – along with a good number of Whites – wanted so badly to show the world that in 2008 our country could be held up as the model for true democracy and equality. America wanted to prove that anyone, regardless of background, who played by the rules and had a vision, could finally be president of the United States.
To his credit, Jesse Jackson saw beyond the rhetoric and somehow had the ability to see deep inside of Obama’s soul and tried to warn us, however clumsy, of what we were getting. So, Rev. Jackson, again I was wrong and you were right. You saw a level of arrogance and detachment from the Black community that most of us were blinded to – or didn’t want to see.
You knew he would not pay attention to the high unemployment rate in the Black community. You knew he would not spend much political capital on the high murder rate in Chicago. You knew he would continue to talk down to Black people. You were rightly ostracized for the way you expressed yourself back in 2008. But on the issue of Obama’s disdain for Blacks; you must be embraced and brought back into the fold.
We wanted Obama to win on many levels. But Jesse Jackson, you have taught us that we should never allow emotions to cloud our judgment. I’m not always right, but I am rarely wrong – and this time, I was definitely wrong.
Raynard Jackson is president & CEO of Raynard Jackson & Associates, LLC., a Washington, D.C.-based public relations/government affairs firm. He can be reached through his Web site, www.raynardjackson.com. You can also follow him on Twitter at raynard1223.

Barbie Rosenblatt
7:18 am on Friday, March 8, 2013
Since Jackson called New York City "Hymietown" I have no respect for him.
JTS53
8:23 am on Friday, March 8, 2013
Who cares? Jesse Jackson is an irrelevant assclown.
Diane in Odenton
10:03 am on Friday, March 8, 2013
Agree.
Sanchez
8:49 am on Friday, March 8, 2013
Apologize to Jessie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJhPLGMhRuQ
1ke
11:16 am on Friday, March 8, 2013
Knew you couldn't bear to read...your attention span issues are growing worse with age. Your angry still works fine though.
1ke
10:39 am on Friday, March 8, 2013
JoeBlob and Seepy, feel like reading? http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/07/opinion/coates-the-good-racist-people.html?_r=3&
Nick DiMarco
10:56 am on Friday, March 8, 2013
A comment left by user Sanchez has been deleted for violating Patch's terms of use regarding profanity.
1ke
11:01 am on Friday, March 8, 2013
All the time, Nick, all the time. The poster Sanchez is a filthy-mouthed person.
His post at 8:49 am is raunchy as well.
Sanchez
11:05 am on Friday, March 8, 2013
Waaaa WaaaaaWaaaaa 1ke says he hates to be treated like he treats others, waaaa waaaa. Arrogant ah.
1ke
12:26 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
You can't stand that someone dislikes with what you write, what you believe, what you probably believe, where you live, who you vote for, how you think. You get all worked up and out of contro, cursing and carrying on. You're probably an ugly old bag-face, too. That's why people get slapped. But, no, you are a gunner. Locked and loaded in case of a crime.
Hope you get banned for your filth. Again
CP
1:00 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
At least his are accurate.
1ke
1:24 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
And, Seepy the Tongue-tied said, "Me, too!"
Sanchez
1:26 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
waaaaaaaaa, waaaaaaaaaaaa 1ke whines like a little girl.
1ke
11:06 am on Friday, March 8, 2013
I am outraged, Joe.
Steve
12:57 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
.....and the Dow Jones hits an all time high. Good job Mr. President!
CP
1:00 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
You cant be serious?
Sanchez
1:03 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
What practical effect does that have on the unemployed?
From the BLS report this week.
Unemployment rates:
WHITES: 6.8%...
BLACKS: 13.8%...
HISPANICS: 9.6%...
TEENAGERS: 25.1%...
"In February, the number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks
or more) was about unchanged at 4.8 million. These individuals accounted for
40.2 percent of the unemployed. (See table A-12.)"
"The employment-population ratio held at 58.6 percent in February. The civilian
labor force participation rate, at 63.5 percent, changed little. (See table A-1.)"
"The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons, at 8.0 million,
was essentially unchanged in February. These individuals were working part
time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to
find a full-time job. (See table A-8.)"
296,000 Americans Drop Out of Labor Force in February.
"According to the report, there were a total of 89.3 million people not in the labor force, up from 89 million in January." From the BLS report.
GREAT job President Downgrade. This is the new ObamaNation Normal.
Sanchez
1:04 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
What do you think of those numbers Jack Hays, aka Steve?
jag
1:13 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
Sanchez, that's not an especially good argument to try and make today considering the market is hitting an all-time high due to great job numbers coming out.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100537056
Maybe next month? Wouldn't bet money on it considering we're up to, what, 36 straight months of job growth and unemployment's at a four year low? Maybe the sequester will help you out, though. You go ahead and have your fingers crossed for America's failure, buddy.
CP
1:22 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
+186K and an unemployment rate of 7.9%
CP
1:23 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
89,304,000 NOT WORKING
1ke
1:25 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
Seepy said, "Duh?"
jag
1:27 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
CP...I provided a link. You don't need to (incorrectly) guess what the numbers were.
Sanchez
1:42 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
Here are the numbers and CP is correct.
CP
3:07 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
jag
http://thinkingrightblog.com/united-states-economy-headed-for-meltdown/#.UTpEtHbHxD8
RARE MARYLAND INDEPENDENT
7:53 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
Good try Willie Nelson. The market is up. Ask most financial advisors - why is it up? Because due to the gubmit artificially keeping interest rates low through QE (printing and journal entry of debt), the attempt is to prop up the market - as there is no where else to go. What happens when QE ends OR a triggering event - balloon pops because structurally, the country is in trouble with too many unemployable workers who cannot read or speak properly and cannot work a full or part time job due to vices. The Wall Street cons are working hard to bring the middle class folks in to fleece them one more time - but this time, these folks are not buying it. A balanced portfolio is always the way to go, but structually, we are in trouble. Eventually, when gas hits 5.00 per gallon here - maybe this summer, it will blow.
At 17 trillion in debt - a 1% increase in the interest we pay on that debt would be devastating.
Sanchez
1:25 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
"due to great job numbers coming out"??? Did you read the report? Apparently not. Did you read my post? Apparently not.
"296,000 Americans Drop Out of Labor Force in February.
"According to the report, there were a total of 89.3 million people not in the labor force, up from 89 million in January." From the BLS report."
"The civilian labor force participation rate, at 63.5 percent, changed little. "
36.5% of all working age people ARE NOT WORKING!
GREAT NUMBERS! Yea that's the ticket! the fewer working the more the workers must pay in tax increases.
The market is a bubble jag and will come crashing down when the fed pumping billions into the economy stops. The highs have zero practical effect on the economy.
jag
1:29 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
Sanchez, the jobs report was undeniably good news. Deal with it. I know you root for the rest of us to have as pathetic a life as you, but it's just not going to happen. Sorry.
Sanchez
1:35 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
Didn't take you long to be an glassbowl jagoff did it. You have shown over and over you cannot debate like a grown civil man. your anger exudes form your pores.
jag
1:41 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
Huh? You're literally ignoring the fact the economy is growing stronger every month and actively rooting against the success of our country. Yet I'm the one who's angry and a "glassbowl"? Yeah, okay. Enjoy your weekend, kiddo.
Sanchez
1:45 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
jagoff says "I know you root for the rest of us to have as pathetic a life as you, but it's just not going to happen. Sorry."
Yes you are angry and incapable of civility in your vile comments.
Honeygo Hal
2:12 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
Joe casually throws out numbers without considering what they mean - 10,000 Baby Boomers reach the age of 65 every day, now and for the next 19 years. Granted, not all of them will retire on that birthday, but do the math and that's why there are fewer people in the work force.
Maybe Joe can coax them out of retirement to keep his taxes down...
http://www.pewresearch.org/daily-number/baby-boomers-retire/
Sanchez
2:15 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
HGH, care to take into account the increasing population and those who are getting to the age ot enter the workforce?
Or do you just throw out numbers without considering what they mean?
Honeygo Hal
2:37 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
Joe, people reach working age every day - just like always - and the increasing population are mostly still too young to work. Give them 10 years or so.
All things considered, I think I'm on firm ground, But you keep throwing them up...
...and we'll keep watching you blow lunch.
Connecticut15
9:20 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Good that Sanchez brought forward the numbers. By way of example, let's see how easy a 10% supposed unemployment rate is really a 18.2% unemployment rate? Simple example: if 1 out of 10 people are out of work that is 10%; if 1 additional other person who dropped out of the workforce is included in total people able to work then instead of 10 total people, it is 11 total people and the true number would have to be 2 people out of work out of 11 total people or 18.2% unemployed out of the entire possible set. THis is why what is NOT included in the calculated numbers is CRITICAL to a true representation. Apparently, the US has tied a 32 year low in the number of people participating in the work force. So, the unemployment rate may not have improved at all but be significantly worse.
CP
9:59 am on Monday, March 11, 2013
Record 47,791,996 Americans on food stamps...
Sanchez
1:47 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
Unemployment rate in 1- 2009 was 7.8% Today it is 7.7% with FEWER PEOPLE in the work force. If you could grasp numbers you too would see the issue.
Sanchez
1:56 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
"the fact the economy is growing stronger every month"
"Economic Growth Is Likely to Be Slow in 2013"
"With economic growth subdued until 2014, CBO forecasts that the unemployment rate will remain high—above 7½ percent through next year. If that occurs, 2014 will be the sixth consecutive year with unemployment exceeding 7½ percent of the labor force, the longest period of such high unemployment in the past 70 years. "
http://www.cbo.gov/publication/43914
Some people are just too stupid to read more than the headlines.
Brian
2:40 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
...and other just refuse to see the glass as half full. THe market is up and unemployment is down. If nothing else, those are positive events that are much better than the Market being down and unemployment being up.
I am just wondering when you give your numbers if you take in to account the ratios and not the pure numbers.
FIFA_archived
2:56 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
Amen Joe.
Brian
3:15 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
et tu FiFA ;-)
1ke
5:47 pm on Friday, March 8, 2013
Maybe they knew each other. I think that engaging in Us vs.Them thinking is sort of like prayer for you, Other Tim. Say "Amen" when you're done.
Steve
12:02 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013
You better tell Bush II that.
RTB
3:39 pm on Saturday, March 9, 2013
So killing innocent civilians on purpose is unacceptable, but killing innocent civilians collaterally so you can take out one person is acceptable? That's rather odd. In both cases, the lives of innocent people have been disregarded to achieve the goal of hurting or killing someone else.
Chris W
10:11 am on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Let's see if there is any hope for you at all.
As an example, the Nazis sent innocent Jews to the death camps, starved them, gassed them, and used some for goulish medical experiments. In our prosecution of the war we killed hundreds of thousands of civilians in Germany durning our bombing raids that were focused on depleting their manufacturing base.
Are these action morally equivilant?
1ke
10:46 am on Sunday, March 10, 2013
I think that there has been a long tradition of bracketing off murders that are committed during "just wars" and murders that are committed in civil society.
Pacifists argue that there is no such thing as a just war.
So what is the test?
Chris W
10:53 am on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Anyone who can equate intentional gennocide with the unintentional killing of civilians has some serious problems.
Does not surprise me though. You guys just love Obama, but he has significantly increased drone strikes that have, in addition to killing the target, killed women and children.
Then you guys have the gall to whine about Bush and Cheney?
FIFA_archived
11:16 am on Sunday, March 10, 2013
What happens to your opinion when you compare intentional genocide with the intentional killing of civilians?
http://nation.time.com/2012/03/27/a-forgotten-horror-the-great-tokyo-air-raid/
PS - I have not seen any one one here commend/condone the use of drone strikes and killing civilians? I know I haven't.
Chris W
11:34 am on Sunday, March 10, 2013
There were industrial targets in most of the bombing raids. No different than in Germany. The Japanese had their own reign of terror. Ever heard of the rape of Nanking?
FIFA_archived
12:02 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
The March 9-10 raids that killed 100,000 was the intentional bombing of civilians.
You attempt now to justify the intentional killing of civilians by saying that they did it too?
Chris W
3:50 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
The fire bombings were directed at industry. Factories and factory workers. Anything else is a bunch of revisionist history crap. Did they know civilians would die, yes, in wars civilians always die.
That's a big difference from sending millions to the gas chambers. I would think even you could agree with that, but perhaps my faith is misplaced.
Chris W
11:38 am on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Your buddy Steve mentioned Bush above and you called attention to it. Of course you don't suddenly approve of the drone strikes, by now that Bush is out and Obama is in his second term and still the drone strikes INCREASED.
I wonder where all the folks from code pink are now. Patiently waiting for the next election I suppose.
Steve
11:57 am on Sunday, March 10, 2013
The drone strikes increased? From how many to how many?
Chris W
12:19 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
How many? By one report, in Pakistan alone, six times more than Bush did in his entire 8 year term.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/05/opinion/bergen-obama-drone
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-10-02/opinions/35279231_1_drone-strikes-anwar-al-awlaki-drone-program
Chris W
3:45 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Steve, alert code pink, march on Washington and demand change.......... Yeah, I thought not. You guys don't care a bit unless there is political gain.
El Capitan
12:03 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Under Obama, an emerging global apparatus for drone killing
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/national-security/under-obama-an-emerging-global-apparatus-for-drone-killing/2011/12/13/gIQANPdILP_story.html
From the liberal rag itself. Stanker Steve pummeled into irrelevance once again.
1ke
12:18 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Before you jump to conclusions solely for the convenience of pursuing a simplistic, as opposed to nuanced, argument, let me be clear.
1. I do not sanction drone strikes in Yemen, Pakistan or Afghanistan.
2. I do not sanction U.S. military interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Mali, Syria or anywhere else.
However,
I understand, however, that policies, once initiated, are hard to reverse.
I understand that, in order to be effective in the least, foreign policy must be consistent and predictable.
I find it difficult to give an across-the-board approval of the current President's role in the current wars, in whatever form they are currently being waged.
He has conducted the country's business with much more discretion, intelligence, decency and integrity than Wolfowitz, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Bush. About that there is no question in my mind.
El Capitan
12:22 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
He has conducted killings with much more "decency"? You are quite the brainwashed little tool, aren't you?
1ke
12:32 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
The business of America is imperialist intervention and killing, B.O. Plenty.
Everybody in America wakes up in the morning and deals with the lesser of the two evils from the workplace to the polling place.
Having you back on Patch is like still another trip the dentist's chair to get the same tooth filled still again.
Hurry up and get banned.
El Capitan
12:38 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
So, just as I said. A hospice-dwelling, brainwashed little tool.
1ke
12:45 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
How was rehab? Did you go the the nice one on the banks of the gorgeous Susquehanna? Too bad the insurance only could pay for the short course.
Chris W
4:52 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Even though he is killing even more more people. Dang, that's devotion.
1ke
12:25 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
"The drone program had a busy year in 2009; under the Obama administration, there were 51 reported strikes in Pakistan’s tribal areas, compared with 45 during the entire administration of George W. Bush." http://www.newamerica.net/publications/policy/the_year_of_the_drone
1ke
12:38 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Oh, dag, B.O. read a real newspaper and not a creepsite!
I guess creepsites dial things back after the PAC money dries up and they fire their editorial staffs.
El Capitan
12:59 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
At least take a step back and acknowledge your hypocrisy, Ike. Somehow, because it's from your exalted Husseinic messiah, the excrement smells better? That's the gist of your ramblings, correct?
Steve
1:06 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Here he goes again with his Scat fetish.
El Capitan
1:12 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
What are you muttering about now, Stanker Steve? Do you really think anyone has any interest whatsoever in the sick activities you practice down in Mom's basement?
1ke
1:24 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Hey, you'll get a chance to vote for another Bush before the bottle drinks you up. Don't despair.
Still pissed about the WMDs, I see. And Birthing. Mitt. Things aren't exactly going your way. At least you got the Sequester to be proud of.
Chris W
3:46 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Sequester belongs to Obummer. It was his idea.
1ke
4:40 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
You're not B.O. However, if you vote yea, you become the part-owner. Are you sure it was your President's idea? I mean, asserting your President's political acuity has not been your habit.
El Capitan
5:33 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
It's a beautiful day out, Ike. Open the windows and let some fresh air into your fetid lair, and maybe you'll be around for the continuation of the Bush dynasty.
1ke
5:39 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Gorgeous day...is a dynasty the logical end of a vigorous democracy or healthy republic?
Given the way you drink, I will certainly be around long after you're gone. The advances in geriatrics far outstrip those in endocrinology. Buddy, when your liver is gone, it's gone.
El Capitan
8:30 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Your assumptions are quite amusing, Ike.
At any rate, use caution when you shamble over to close the windows tonight. I suspect that one foot is already underground.
1ke
8:41 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
You old goat. El Capitan...heh heh...you wish. Lays down flat as Kansas.
Bee ohh.
FIFA_archived
8:48 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Kong OHHHH, soon bye bye.
El Capitan
8:59 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
Lays down flat as Kansas? Must be talking about the flagpole, Ike. I bet its been flat as Kansas for decades. LMAO
JayKay
5:04 pm on Friday, April 5, 2013
Jesse Jackson SR. will always hold a special place in hell for that little MLK thing. He never hit the deck, just knew that only one shot would be taken, and not at him of course. Some nice photos taken of him and the other two frauds at the scene by FBI informant/photographer. You can read about that in an expose in the Memphis paper back in 2010if I recall correctly.
Steve
5:22 pm on Friday, April 5, 2013
JayKay, You are spot on. Andrew Young told me about that day.
JayKay
1:34 pm on Sunday, April 7, 2013
I have an arsenal of uncomfortable facts I hope to find appropriate places to drop. this is only the beginning.
Gregg Roberts
10:00 am on Friday, May 3, 2013
Jesse Jackson accused Obama of ''acting white'' and you apoligized to him? I'm sorry sir but that is offensive.
It is the same as if I accused a white person of ''acting black''
I happened to have met Jesse Jackson and while his championship of the black community is undeniable, he is in a true definition of the word a racist. He is filled with comments like the one above that are offensive about white people. It goes both ways.